Conflux 9, the aftermath
I said I would get around to a quick wrap up post for Conflux 9, the 52nd NatCon, that happened last week. It’s fast becoming history and life is barrelling on (seriously, May, calm the fuck down) and so I thought I’d better get around to it now or I never would. First and foremost, congratulations to co-chairs Donna Hanson and Nicole Murphy and the whole Conflux team. They did an amazing job and it really was a great con. Conflux is always my favourite of the year – open, friendly, inspiring – and this year it had all that in spades.
Much time was spent in the bar with friends old and new, drinking too much and talking shit. Which is, after all, one of the main purposes of a con. I have a few highlights persisting through the alcoholic haze. If this con had a theme beyond the official one, it was book launches. So many amazing books were thrust out into the world at Conflux 9.
Cat Sparks’ new collection, The Bride Price, was launched and sold out. Highlights there included Cat drinking champagne from a mug (classy lady, is Cat Sparks) and telling people during her little speech to “Now go and buy my fucking book!” This was particularly entertaining as she was standing three feet from Thoraiya Dyer’s four year old daughter at the time. I don’t know why, I just find that stuff hilarious. Especially when Thoraiya stepped up to buy a book and said to Cat, “Thanks for swearing in front of my kid.” Ah, I laughed.
Rob Hood also launched his amazing novel, Fragments of a Broken Land, which also sold out. And seriously, go and buy that book, folks, because it’s brilliant. Something actually different and dark and bloody good. And Jo Anderton sold out at the launch of her new collection, The Bone Chime Song & Other Stories, which is also dark and different and also fucking brilliant. Such talented writers making work in Australia.
I enjoyed the panels I was on too. Talking horror with Kaaron Warren, Kirstyn McDermott, Jason Nahrung and Terry Dowling was probably my favourite panel of the con. I also really enjoyed talking about authors and social media with Alex Adsett, Abigail Nathan, Zena Shapter and Russell B Farr. The best bit about that panel was that we got the panel trending on Twitter while it happened. Fuck yeah, social media masters at work!
Another highlight, as it always is at the NatCon, was the Ditmar Award ceremony. Loads of lovely people being justly rewarded for their fantastic work. Deb Biancotti did a great job of hosting and the thing even ran to time. There was a live Twitter screen by the stage, too. Look at Conflux all up in the future. And a particular highlight there was Russell B Farr getting the A Bertram Chandler Award for his services to SF. Russ has been an amazing advocate of Australian specfic since around 1996 and his press, Ticonderoga Publications, puts out seriously brilliant books. He really deserved that award and I’m glad he got it. I’m also glad because it made him generous with the whisky in the bar afterwards. Russell, and his partner in crime, life and publishing, Liz Grzyb, have been kind enough to publish several of my stories over the years and I hope they continue to do so. I’m very proud to be a small part of the Ticonderoga legacy.
I also sold all bar one copy of Dark Rite that I took to the con with me, so that’s another highlight. I must thank profusely the CSFG for letting me have my books for sale on their table in the dealer room.
I’m sure there was a lot more I should be talking about, and I apologise for anything I’ve missed that really needs a mention, but it’s all blended into that delicious post-con haze of friendship and inspiration. So I’m off to write now, and see if I can’t try to be even a fraction as talented as some of my wonderful friends. If you’d like a pictorial idea of what happened, check out Cat Sparks’ Flickr stream here, with loads of pics from throughout the con.
.
Home to nice reviews
I’m back from Conflux 9 and a damn fine time was had by all. Great to catch up with old friends, make some new friends and drink too much. I’ll write up a proper report soon, probably tomorrow. I’m too brain dead today and have a bunch of classes to teach, so might go for a little lie down for while beforehand. But I came back to some very nice reviews of Dark Rite, which is always wonderful.
Firstly, the very cool Damien Smith wrote us this review for Thirteen O’Clock, where he says: “a rollercoaster ride that kept me turning the pages until I was almost late for work” among other nice things.
And US author Terry Ervin II had this to say:
“Unraveling the mystery of his dad’s death turns into a nightmare as Grant finds himself mired in a dark cult’s secret that long ago engulfed a small town, and threatens Cassie, a girl he’s fallen for. Grant knows he’s doomed, but that doesn’t mean the demon worshipers have to win.
As the plot began to unfold, I found myself unwilling to put the book aside until I reached the end.”
–Terry W. Ervin II, author of Blood Sword
Bloody lovely. But for now, a snoozzzzzzzz…
.
Dead Robots’ Society Podcast
I got up a bit earlier than usual this morning to be a guest on the Dead Robots’ Society Podcast along with David Wood. We had a lot of fun, talked about genre fiction and horror especially. Of course, we were mostly talking up Dark Rite as that’s the new and current thing.
It’s a great podcast and we had a good laugh with hosts Justin Macumber and Paul Elard Cooley. The episode is up and available already, so go here to have a listen.
On that front, I was very happy today to see that Dark Rite is at number 42 in Horror Hot New Releases on Amazon, and number 17 in Occult Horror Hot New Releases. Thanks to everyone who had bought a copy – you people rock.
.
New publications like buses
It’s a funny old game, this writing business. High highs and crushing lows. Hours of toil for seemingly no return, wondering why we bother, then something happens that reminds us exactly why we bother. And I don’t know if this is the case for other writers, but my career seems to always be a fluctuation of flood and drought. Right now, I’m very happy to say, it’s a bit of a flood.
I’ve been banging on about Dark Rite the last week or so, as that book has just been published. I won’t say more on that for now, other than to mention that at the time of writing it’s sitting at #39 in bestsellers for horror on Amazon. That’s great news, so thanks to all who bought a copy.
I’ve also had some excellent news in other areas too. In order of happenings, I’ve sold my contemporary fantasy story, Roll The Bones, to Crowded Magazine. Crowded is a new pro-paying magazine in Australia with a very funky idea on crowdsourcing its content. Do check it out whether you’re a reader (as it has some excellent content!) or a writer (pro rates!) That should be out around the middle of the year.
Secondly, I’ve sold my wild west ghost story, Not The Worst Of Sins, to Beneath Ceaseless Skies, due out around the northern autumn. I’m very excited about this one, as BCS is one of my favourite pro-zines and I’m really happy to get published there.
And, as if all that wasn’t enough, I can announce today that my story, Tiny Lives, originally published at the end of last year in Daily Science Fiction, has made the cut to be reprinted in the Year’s Best Australian Fantasy & Horror 2012, due out soon from Ticonderoga Publications.
See what I mean about a flood? It’s a flood of fucking awesome, is what it is. These are the times you have to remember when the slog is getting you down and the rejections are threatening to drown you. Hard work and perseverance pays off, as long as you have the pig-headed determination to never give up and to always work on improving your craft.
I’m sharing some amazing company in the 2012 Year’s Best. Here’s the full ToC:
- Joanne Anderton, “Tied To The Waste”, Tales Of Talisman
- R.J. Astruc, “The Cook of Pearl House, A Malay Sailor by the Name of Maurice”, Dark Edifice 2
- Lee Battersby, “Comfort Ghost”, Andromeda Spaceways Inflight Magazine 56
- Alan Baxter, “Tiny Lives”, Daily Science Fiction
- Jenny Blackford, “A Moveable Feast”, Bloodstones
- Eddy Burger, “The Witch’s Wardrobe”, Dark Edifice 3
- Isobelle Carmody, “The Stone Witch”, Under My Hat
- Jay Caselberg, “Beautiful”, The Washington Pastime
- Stephen Dedman, “The Fall”, Exotic Gothic 4, Postscripts
- Felicity Dowker, “To Wish On A Clockwork Heart”, Bread And Circuses
- Terry Dowling, “Nightside Eye”, Cemetary Dance
- Tom Dullemond, “Population Management”, Danse Macabre
- Thoraiya Dyer, “Sleeping Beauty”, Epilogue
- Will Elliot, “Hungry Man”, The Apex Book Of World SF
- Jason Fischer, “Pigroot Flat”, Midnight Echo 8
- Dirk Flinthart, “The Bull In Winter”, Bloodstones
- Lisa L. Hannett, “Sweet Subtleties”, Clarkesworld
- Lisa L. Hannett & Angela Slatter, “Bella Beaufort Goes To War”, Midnight And Moonshine
- Narrelle M. Harris, “Stalemate”, Showtime
- Kathleen Jennings, “Kindling”, Light Touch Paper, Stand Clear
- Gary Kemble, “Saturday Night at the Milkbar”, Midnight Echo 7
- Margo Lanagan, “Crow And Caper, Caper And Crow”, Under My Hat
- Martin Livings, “You Ain’t Heard Nothing Yet”, Living With The Dead
- Penelope Love, “A Small Bad Thing”, Bloodstones
- Andrew J. McKiernan, “Torch Song”, From Stage Door Shadows
- Karen Maric, “Anvil Of The Sun”, Aurealis
- Faith Mudge, “Oracle’s Tower”, To Spin A Darker Stair
- Nicole Murphy, “The Black Star Killer”, Damnation And Dames
- Jason Nahrung, “The Last Boat To Eden”, Surviving The End
- Tansy Rayner Roberts, “What Books Survive”, Epilogue
- Angela Slatter, “Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean”, This Is Horror Webzine
- Anna Tambour, “The Dog Who Wished He’d Never Heard Of Lovecraft”, Lovecraft Zine
- Kyla Ward, “The Loquacious Cadaver”, The Lion And The Aardvark: Aesop’s Modern Fables
- Kaaron Warren, “River Of Memory”, Zombies Vs. Robots
And look at that fantastic cover art! You can pre-order your copy of the Year’s Best here. In addition to the above incredible tales, the volume will include a review of 2012 and a list of highly recommended stories.
I’ll be sure to let you know when these publications come out.
.
Dark Rite out now!
It’s official! Dark Rite, the short horror novel/very long novella I co-wrote with David Wood, is available now! *trembles* You can find it in any ebook format you prefer, DRM-free, from Smashwords, or you can buy the Kindle or print edition from Amazon. Only $2.99 for the ebook and $7.99 for print. How can you possibly go wrong? It’ll be available in all the usual places soon, so watch your favourite store if you prefer to shop elsewhere. If you click on the cover image there, it’ll take you to a page of information about the book with direct buy buttons.
So it’s happy book day to myself and Dave. It’s always very exciting when a new book comes out, and I hope any of you horror fans out there enjoy it. Here’s a few responses we’ve had from early readers:
“Wood and Baxter have delivered a stunning tale that reminds of an early Stephen King’s talent for the macabre with a pinch of Graham Masterton’s flair for witchcraft and terror. A sinister tale of black magic and horror – not for the faint hearted.” – Greig Beck, bestselling author of Beneath the Dark Ice and Black Mountain
“With mysterious rituals, macabre rites and superb supernatural action scenes, Wood and Baxter deliver a fast-paced horror thriller.” – J.F. Penn, author of the bestselling ARKANE thriller series
“Wood and Baxter have taken on the classic black magic/cult conspiracy subgenre, chucked in a toxic mix of weirdness, creepshow chills and action, and created a tale that reads like a latter-day Hammer Horror thriller. Nice, dark fun.” – Robert Hood, author of Immaterial and Fragments of a Broken Land: Valarl Undead
That’s right – Greig Beck said it’s a bit like Stephen King and Graham Masterton. Holy shit, you guys! I think I’ll leave it at that. If you do buy a copy, I’d love to know what you think. You know where to find me.
.
Book day nerves and why they’re a good thing
I’m trepidatious. Kinda nerve-wracked. The novella I’ve co-authored with David Wood, Dark Rite, is due for release tomorrow. Hopefully it will become available then, or very soon after. I’ll be sure to let you know. And because of its imminent release, I’m quietly terrified.
I’m also very excited, of course. It’s great to get a new book out there. While this is technically a novella, it kind of bridges the gap, because it’s bloody long for a novella. The Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America specify word lengths for each category of its Nebula award categories like this:
Novel – over 40,000 words
Novella – 17,500 to 40,000 words
Novelette – 7,500 to 17,500 words
Short story – under 7,500 words
As far as I know, the Aurealis Awards here in Australia use the same categorisation. Dark Rite is something like 42,250 words. Which is sorta dumb of us, because it will be classed as a novel rather than a novella for awards and we could have cut 2,251 words and dropped it back into the novella category if we really wanted to. But we talked about it and were happy with the tightness and finish of the story. It seems presumptuous and counter-productive to chop at a story purely for award lengths or to accurately describe its category. The story is exactly as long as it needs to be, so we’re sticking with it. And I’ll describe it as a very long novella, even though it’s technically a very short novel.
But I digress. Nerves. I was talking about book day terror. Whether it’s a full-length novel, a long novella/short novel, a novelette or a short story being published in a magazine or anthology, the same kind of nerves are always there. Will people like it? Will people read it and point and laugh like Nelson Munz? Will I be revealed for the try-hard, pointless hack my inner demons often tell me I am, in the darkest corners of the night when I’m wondering why I fucking bother.
If it’s a magazine or anthology, the terror is that mine will be the story reviewers talk about for all the wrong reasons. “A tremendous collection of short fiction, with only one story out of place. You have to wonder what the editor was thinking, including this sloppy turd by Baxter.”
Of course, that kind of thinking is an insult to the editor, because they picked the story and included it for a reason, and their name is all over the publication. But publication nerves know nothing of common sense and laugh in the face of logic.
If it’s a book or novella, something that is going out there on its own merit, the nerves are the same, only amplified. There are no other works to hide among. It’s just you, out there in public without your pants on. Metaphorically speaking. You know you can’t please everyone, even Neil Gaiman gets one star reviews, but you hope to please more people than you offend. You want more cries of Bravo! and very few Ha-Has! But you don’t know if you’ll get them. Hell, you don’t know if anybody will even read your work. The only thing worse than bad reviews is no one turning a single fucking page of the thing you slaved over. At least a bad review meant the thing got read.
But I realised, especially reinforced after the recent series of guest posts I’ve run about Ongoing Angst, that this stuff is not only common among writers of every level, but actually a good thing. I’m bloody nervous, because I care. I care not because I want people to like me, but because I want them to like the work. I want people to read my stories and get something out of them, be moved in some way, have a rollicking good time and recommend their friends and family read my stuff too. They don’t ever need to know who the fuck I am, as long as they know and enjoy the work. And my fear comes from the thought that my work might not be good enough. And that fear drives me to always do my best, to always try to be better.
I strive to get better all the time. I work my arse off trying to make my writing as good as it can be. Nerves like this are symbolic of an artist striving to be good enough. If I ever don’t get nervous when a publication is due I’m going to wonder where my fire went. Because I’m certainly not arrogant enough to think people are automatically going to like everything I get published. Nerves are a good thing – they remind you that you’re alive and striving. That this shit matters. Because it really does matter. Through fiction we look at our lives and the life around us, and it matters. Even fun, pulpy horror like Dark Rite has things to say about society and humanity. It’s deeper than just a gloss imagery. And I care about it. I really hope readers do too.
I’ve got a bunch of stuff due for publication over the next two or three months, in magazines and anthologies, and it’s all kicking off with the release of Dark Rite any day now. So I really hope you like it. I’ll be over here, chewing on the bony tips of fingers, cos I finished eating through the nails a couple of days ago.
(Of course, the beauty of this one is that it’s co-authored. So it if does go down well, I’ll bask in all the glory. If it tanks, I’ll just blame David Wood.)
.
Conflux 9, 52nd NatCon – my schedule
It’s convention time again. My favourite con every year is Conflux in Canberra. I can’t really explain why other than that it’s always well-organised, always good fun and always has a very inclusive and open vibe about it. It’s also a great chance to catch up with all my writerly friends, who I usually only get to interact with online from the shadowy corners of my writing cave. It’s Conflux 9 this year, and it’s also the NatCon, or National Convention. Each year in Australia, one of the state conventions takes on the role of being Natcon – that makes it the biggest con of the year and means it has extra stuff happening, not least of which is the Ditmar Award ceremony. The Ditmars are like the Australian Hugos, so it’s all good fun.
Conflux 9 runs from Thursday 25th April through to Sunday 28th April, at Rydges Capital Hill in Barton, Canberra. All the details can be found at that link. There’s loads going on, so if you have any chance to get along to Canberra for all or some of the con, I would highly recommend it. There are day passes as well as full con memberships.
I’m going to be involved in a few things:
Thursday 9 – 9.55pm – The Horror Spectrum panel – What forms does horror take? Domestic, psychological or slash? Is there more to it and why do fans like it and why do some writers write it?
There’s always one of these panels at cons and I often seem to sit on them. It’s one of those impossible questions to really answer and almost always devolves into an hour of trying to pin down just what horror is, but it’s usually enjoyable nonetheless. If nothing else, it usually helps to convince some people that there’s a lot more to horror than the torture porn so prevalent in movies right now.
Thursday 10 – 10.55pm – Taboo subjects for authors panel – Fiction these days seems to have no boundaries as to what is good taste, yet there are boundaries, depending on the genre, or are there?
This is another one I always like to get involved with, mainly because I sit firmly in the “fuck your taboos!” camp. But there are some places we don’t go, there are some places we should tread very carefully and there are some places we can stomp all over. So I’ll enjoy discussing that stuff because I’m bound to piss some people off.
Friday 11.30am – 12.25pm – Crowd funding – what is it? How does it work? panel – Crowd funding (using websites like Kickstarter and Indie Gogo to convince complete strangers to fund your creative work) have become the in thing. How do they work? How do they work best? Is this the answer for whatever dilemma you’re facing?
Or should you stop begging and work fucking hard like the rest of us? I’m going to enjoy this one. (And I’m actually a fan of crowd-funding used well.)
Sunday 11am – Reading
I have a reading session here that I think is probably a half an hour long. I’m not sure yet what I’ll be reading – I’m thinking I might read one of my newer short stories that’s about to be published… I’ll have to think on that, but it’ll be something new. And probably a short story rather than a novel excerpt, as that way people get something complete rather than just a teaser.
Sunday 3.30 – 4.30pm – Elegant promotion or just plain annoying panel – Promoting yourself with social media. The tips and traps of promoting books, films, events or your sense of humour. Take a journey through good and bad examples. This panel discusses various pros and cons of reaching audiences in this digital age.
Again, this should be a lot of fun, especially as I’m such an internet whore and happy to bandy myself all over the place. But even then, I do have a pretty strict set of personal guidelines I use to manage my online activity.
So those are my official engagements for the con. The rest of the time I’ll probably… who am I kidding? I’ll definitely be in the bar. Please come and say hello, hang out, drink and partake of the “convention airing of grievances” (about anything). It’s half of what it’s all about. Hopefully see you there!
.
On Word Frequency Analysis and Advanced Procrastination for Writers by Ian McHugh
Ian McHugh is a fellow member of the CSFG and we were having a discussing on the mailing list the other day about this strange thing Ian had discovered in terms of word frequency in fiction. So I asked him if he’d consider writing up his findings and guest posting here for me. After all, that saves me having to write up what he found and it’s his baby anyway. He was foolish kind enough to agree. So, many thanks to Ian and hopefully you guys might find some of this quite interesting.
On Word Frequency Analysis and Advanced Procrastination for Writers
by Ian McHugh (ianmchugh.wordpress.com)
A few weeks ago, fellow CSFG member Phill Berrie wrote a post about word frequency analysis, a tool he uses in his work as an editor. In his post, Phill included a link to a free online word frequency analyser. Plug the text of your story in and it spits out:
- the total word count of the story
- how many different unique words you’ve used (a, few, weeks, ago, etc)
- and how many times you’ve used them (a=36, few=5, weeks=2, ago=2)
Since I had set aside that weekend for working on the final draft of my novel, I decided instead (see “advanced procrastination”, above) to plug a few of my stories into the online analyser and see what the results were. After plugging all of my stories into the analyser, it told me a bunch of stuff that I already pretty well knew:
- I’m using less adjectives and adverbs than I used to.
- I have developed a habit of overusing the word as to join two clauses in a sentence.
- I somehow don’t write stories between 3,000 and 4,000 words long. Like, ever.
What it also showed, that I hadn’t realised before, was that the number of different unique words that I use has fallen by about 20-25% since I first started writing. For stories over 6,000 words, my number of unique words per thousand has dropped from up near 300 to under 230.
So, why?
I had a couple of hypotheses:
Hypothesis #1
My vocabulary is shrinking. No, seriously. I had to look up synonyms for theory to find hypothesis. Then I had to look up like to find synonym. I was very hard on my brain in my late teens and early twenties – like, “I can’t really remember 1991 to 1994” kind of hard on my brain. I flunked out of art school because I was too stoned and drunk. Art school. That’s like flunking out of rock’n’roll for doing too much cocaine, only less cool. These days when I’m speaking, I often lose my words in mid-sentence. Maybe I’m using less words because I’m losing my words?
Hypothesis #2
Or, given that I’m using less adjectives and adverbs in my stories, maybe I’m just cutting out the crap?
So I wondered what the unique word counts would be for writers operating at a higher level than me. I just happened to have a softcopy of Kaaron Warren’s first short story collection, The Grinding House, so I plugged a few of Kaaron’s old stories into the analyser. Casting about, I also had a softcopy of a longish Lucius Shepard story from Issue 1 of Crowded Magazine. In both cases, I found that the unique word counts were down around 200 per 1,000 words.
Interesting!
Then I went to Tor.com and grabbed a few stories by authors who I immediately recognised as famous, award-winners, working novelists etc, and plugged those in. There was a wider range, but most of the unique word counts were still at or below the low end of my own stories.
So, does this mean that better writers use less words, but use them better? It’s an appealing idea. Had I cracked the secret code to being a better writer?
Yeah, no.
Nice idea, but it holds water about as well as… as one of them thingies that you wash lettuce in… like a bowl, but with holes in it… eh, nevermind.
When I threw a wider net (this was still my novel-editing weekend, mind you – advanced procrastination, remember) and looked at a larger sample of stories from online SFWA pro-markets (including more stories from Tor.com and stories from Apex, Beneath Ceaseless Skies, Clarkesworld, Lightspeed and Strange Horizons) the unique word counts were all over the place. Including from some of the same authors I’d looked at in the first sample. So much so that it’s not even meaningful to talk about any kind of mean or median.
If anything, many of them were opposite to where my stories have been headed, with unique word counts above my high early average.
So where does this leave me? Back at Hypothesis #1? Was Kaaron also hard on her brain in her youth?
Is there maybe some superficial similarity between my writing style and Kaaron’s writing style? Or at least, Kaaron Warren circa 1994 to 2003? Hell, I’d take that, any day.
Colander!
In all honesty, I wouldn’t say that my writing style really is like Kaaron’s in any way you’d notice, but if I have lifted something from her work and incorporated it into my own, it wouldn’t be at all surprising. The Grinding House was a book that made a big impression on me in the early part of my writing career. (Kaaron still uses a quote from my review of it.)
Similarly, if there’s any single story that most influenced me as a new writer, it was Tony Daniel’s “A Dry Quiet War”. Because of that story, I wrote ““Bitter Dreams”, which is probably still my best story, and have kept on writing Westerns since then. “A Dry Quiet War” has a unique word count under 200 per thousand words.
Shepard was another early influence. While he does write elaborate fantasy stories (the Dragon Graiule tales, for example), he’s also written knuckle-dragging, hairy-backed manly stories for Playboy, with protagonists who are terse like the love-child of Clint Eastwood and Conan the Barbarian.
Maybe there’s a clue there. I tend to write in a close third-person or, occasionally, first-person point of view. A lot of my recent stories have featured protagonists who are in some way “simple” – mentally simple, children, from simple socio-cultural settings, or just plain terse. It follows that, with a close point-of-view, the narrative voice for a simple character should also be simple.
Simple character = simple language = lower unique word count.
And a lot of my more complex and elaborate stories are ones with higher unique word counts.
That seems like one of those revelations that’s bleeding obvious once you see it. “Well, of course I knew that!” I think there’s a lesson there, though, in terms of writing consciously for your character’s voice.
And another thing I found? One of the sweet spots for story length for (at least the) SFWA pro markets (I looked at) seems to be between 3,000 and 4,000 words long.
Sigh.
Another sweet spot seems to be between 5,000 and 6,000 words – in which range my stories have, overall, been noticeably less successful than they have over 6,000 words or under 3,000.
Well, I guess if nothing else I found out what I need to work on.
And I did also write/edit nearly 10,000 words of the final draft of my novel that weekend.
Advanced procrastination.
Speaking of which: You should be writing! So go find your character’s voice, and get back to work!
.
The Ongoing Angst of Successful Writers – Conclusions
I’ve really enjoyed the recent run of guest posts from six of Australia’s most successful genre writers. Here I’ll try to collate the overlapping themes from those posts into one place (and have links to all the posts in one place too.) First and foremost, I’d like to thank the six respondents for giving their time and honesty to the idea. So here are the links to each individual post, with my heartfelt thanks:
I expected considerable consensus from all of these talented writers to most of the questions. It’s pretty obvious the questions were loaded to that end, but that was because I’ve regularly seen those kind of comments from writers of all styles and all levels of success. But let’s go through each of the three questions and see what the key themes were.
1. What do you still fear as a writer, when it comes to putting your work out there? What fills you with doubt and angst?
This is the question that I knew would draw the most consensus. The over-riding responses were of “imposter syndrome” – that dark and quiet thought that no matter how much success you see, at some point everyone is going to realise you’re a hack, or that one day everyone will point and laugh because they’ve all been having you along all this time. It’s simply the fear of not being good enough, contrary to all the available evidence. Or there’s been some terrible mistake.
Kaaron said: I’m still sure that one day someone will say, “You do realise it’s all been an elaborate joke we’ve played on you? You’re a crap writer and no one has ever liked anything you’ve ever written.” Trudi said: “one day I’ll discover that every person who liked and bought my books was just being polite” although she also pointed out: “but I can laugh it off.” That’ll happen when you’ve sold as many books as Trudi has!
In terms of being good enough, Jo said: “I fear being ignored, but I fear attention too. Silence is disheartening, but when people do sit up and take notice I’m terrified they’ll hate the story, tell everyone they know, and then laugh at me. Loudly.” Angela said: “you’ve lavished all your love, attention and care on it, that you’ve flensed and polished it until it looks like a slightly evil supermodel, but that when it’s out in the public gaze someone will find a fault you didn’t see.”
Lisa used a quote from Keats that summed things up well and she explained it thus: “It’s that niggling doubt that you’re not necessarily crap, but that what you’re writing isn’t adding anything exciting to the mix. That it’s just mediocre. That it’s not just forgotten, but forgettable. Now that’s scary.”
I think these fears are actually encouraging. Of course, that doesn’t help in our darkest moments of self-doubt, but the fear we’re not good enough leads to a desire to always be better. I think that’s essential to growth in any art. If we start to think we’re good enough, that we can’t learn more or get better, then surely our work will stagnate and become, at best, ordinary. Not necessarily crap, as Lisa says, but pedestrian. In the pursuit of any art, we need to constantly strive to be better, to out-do what we’ve done before. Sometimes we’ll succeed and sometimes we won’t – we may write something that truly resonates and then write a lot of stuff that doesn’t reach those heights again for quite a while. But we must always strive to do so regardless and surely, as our skill and experience improve, we will reach those heights again, and beyond. There’s no ceiling to how high we can go if we always strive to improve. I think the fear of not being good enough is what constantly drives us in that pursuit.
Margo made an interesting point that bad reviews can sometimes fuel that self-doubt. She said: “those voices feed directly into, and reinforce, that other voice inside me that’s ready to tear me down and call me a fraud”.
Interestingly enough, just yesterday Chuck Wendig posted this blog, about that very same thing. He calls it the “writer as stowaway”. He has two new books coming out soon and the early copies have gone out for review. He describes the feeling like this:
all the while I’ve got that flurry of fear-bubbles in my tummy: egads they won’t like it they’ll despise it I’m going to receive hate mail people might punch me Kirkus and Publisher’s Weekly will probably give me whatever the opposite of a starred review is like maybe they’ll rub a cat’s butthole on my face in public OH GODS THAT’S HOW BAD THIS BOOK IS.
In classic Wendig style, he echoes exactly what the writers in my guest posts have said.
The second question I asked was:
2. What career markers do you still strive for? What heights are you determined to scale?
I asked this for a very specific reason. Whenever I talk to other writers about their successes, whether they’re new and have just had their first publication or whether they’re as successful as the guest post respondents, there’s always one over-riding response: “Yes, but I haven’t done X yet.” That might be anything from making a sale to a pro market, selling a novel even after massive short fiction success, getting a bigger advance even after a 7 figure deal or anything else. Regardless of levels of success, writers are always striving for more. And I think that’s a good thing – it goes hand in hand with always striving to be better. We want to get better all the time and we measure whether we are getting better by whether or not we score those better publications, bigger advances, more awards, movie deals, etc.
In answering that question, we got some interesting variations on the theme. Kaaron would love to sell a story to the New Yorker and get a call from Hollywood. Jo would prefer a Manga or videogame deal. Angela strives for constantly better markets for her work. Lisa has similar desires to Angela and they both want to see their novel-length work finished and in a good home. Trudi wants to see better success in the US market and wouldn’t mind a call from Hollywood too. Margo wants her work to constantly plumb deeper into truer depths of humanity.
And beyond all this, the over-riding desire (which overlapped this question and the next) was for their writing to be successful enough that they could give up the day jobs (or work less) and have the time to write as much and as often as they like. As Margo put it so well when she talked about who she envies: “anyone who’s had (and earned out) a seven-figure-or-more advance, or freakishly big sales, gives me a bit of a pang, simply because they can buy the slabs of time that make the efficient production of regular novels possible. They can focus, you know? They don’t have to always be fighting their way towards the writing; they can just pay the world to go away.”
(The exception to this desire, perhaps, is Trudi, but that’s because she’s already done that!)
And, as I said, the previous answers cross over with the answers to the third question I asked:
3. Whose career do you envy? Why?
I deliberately used the word “envy” because it’s very loaded. And I expected exactly what I got – very little in the way of actual envy. Margo’s answer above was one of desire rather than real envy – she doesn’t envy the people, just the time they have. As Trudi said: ”Envy is pointless.”
She’s right. Envy is a destructive emotion. I’ve always seen the success of others as proof that any of us can succeed, and that includes me. As Trudi went on to say: ”I’ve always been excited when someone has succeeded at doing something I want to do, as that proves it’s possible.”
Of course, those natural pangs of “Why not me!” are always there when we read about the success of others. As Lisa said: “It’s only natural to have a pang of oh-I-wish-that-was-me! when a new writer skyrockets to stardom apparently out of nowhere — but it’s not actual envy.”
Lisa then talked about the writers she respects and admires. She doesn’t envy them, she just wants a career like theirs. Jo said a similar thing, citing writers she admires and whose careers she’d like to follow.
Kaaron was a little more honest in her use of the word envy, but it boiled down to the same thing. An admiration of people who have got to a position she’d like to see herself in and a desire to get there too. In this instance, that’s not envy as a destructive emotion, but as a rallying call. Perhaps Angela summed it up best with this:
”I don’t envy anyone – what good would that do me? Envy is a wasteful emotion based in insecurity – yes, that’s a life lesson, not just a writing lesson. Comparing yourself to other people is destructive and a waste of time. When you look at successful writers, you need to remember that they had to do the hard yards before they were successful – there are no easy rides in this business. Everyone suffered rejections of novels they’d lavished attention on; everyone has had to do jobs they’ve hated just to make ends meet; but every successful writer has kept on writing. That’s the secret: keep writing, keep learning, keep improving.
By all means look at successful writers and learn from them – that’s what they’re there for, to act as models of ‘here’s one we prepared earlier’, rather than ‘oh, I wish I was [insert name here], I’ll never be as good as her/him, wah-wah-wah!’
Never stop learning – at no point in your career should you think ‘I know it all – no one can tell me anything!’ There’s always something new to learn or something to re-learn that you’ve started taking for granted and kind of forgotten.
So, envy no one, learn from everyone.”
So really, there are three primary things that we can take away from all of this:
1. Everyone struggles with self-doubt and is always concerned that they’re not good enough. It’s a natural and valuable thing, because it means we will always strive to be better.
2. We all want more from our careers – we want better publications, more readers, more money from writing so that writing is all we have to do and other jobs don’t distract us from our passion. And it’s good to desire those things.
3. There’s no point wasting our time envying others. Their success is proof of the possibility of our own success and we can learn from them and strive to have careers like them. There’s no reason we can’t have success like theirs if we accept but rise above the self-doubt and always work at learning and improving.
Beyond anything else, the simple truth is always the same. Keep writing. Regardless of doubt, fear, setbacks, the success of others or anything else, the successful writers are the ones who keep writing. Keep learning, keep striving to be better, keep putting your arse in that chair and your fingers on those keys and keep writing.
If the answers above tell us anything, it’s that there’s never an end to the process. We’ll never be happy with where we are and we’ll always strive for more. That’s what it is to be a writer. If you haven’t got that, you have to ask yourself – how much do you really want it?
Keep writing.
.
The Ongoing Angst of Successful Writers 6 – Margo Lanagan
Time for the last in my series of “Ongoing Angst” guest posts. Last week we heard from Kaaron Warren, Jo Anderton and Angela Slatter. This week we’ve had Lisa L Hannett and Trudi Canavan. Today Margo Lanagan will be the last of the guest posts and tomorrow I’ll try to collate all the answers into one post with all the links. Answers to what, you ask?
Well, it’s award season at the moment and lots of very deserving people are having their wonderful work recognised with nominations and wins of some of Australia’s (and the world’s) most prestigious prizes. But something I’ve noticed a lot is that no matter how successful a writer may be (in terms of publications, awards or anything else), they always worry that they’re not good enough, or that there are career heights they’ve yet to scale. It’s been said many times that the day you stop worrying about whether or not you’re good enough is the day you’ve lost your passion. So I thought to myself, there are some amazingly talented, successful and well-rewarded writers in Australia who probably feel this way too. And if you’re a writer of any level, be it newly emerging or well-established, it’s always good to hear that stuff. It’s good to be reminded that you’re not alone in your insecurities. I certainly like to know that it’s not just me who lies awake at night, terrified that tomorrow everyone will realise I’m a hack!
So I’ve asked these wonderful and tremendously successful writers (who are also people I’m lucky enough to call my friends) to answer three simple questions. The links above are to the previous kind respondents, below you’ll find a post from Margo. Seriously, between them these writers have nominations or wins in just about every genre writing award you can think of, not to mention heaps of amazing publications, all of which you should check out if you haven’t already.

Photo by Steven Dunbar
1. What do you still fear as a writer, when it comes to putting your work out there? What fills you with doubt and angst?
I don’t fear it, exactly, but I find a stacks-on-the-mill response like this hard to confront. This little clump of reviews (it’s a whole book-club of associated reviews; this is just one of the set that came in, bam-bam-bam over several days) made me decide to switch off Google Alerts. I don’t have an issue with people recording what they think, even if it’s hostile, but there’s a certain critical mass of sneering and snarking that I discovered it’s not healthy for me to absorb.
I think this is because those voices feed directly into, and reinforce, that other voice inside me that’s ready to tear me down and call me a fraud, at low moments. It’s almost exactly the tone that my inner editor at her most destructive uses. She’s not helpful; she doesn’t get the next story written. Down, madam! Enough of you! *hunts around for inner rave reviewer*
2. What career markers do you still strive for? What heights are you determined to scale?
What I would like is to have more choices. I would like my day job to be work that I was doing for interest’s sake, and story-material’s sake, rather than because the driest, dullest kind of writing (tech writing) pays the best.
I mean, I’m greedy; I could live in a caravan on a friend’s bush block to get by on book earnings, but I don’t want to have to. I want to pay off my mortgage early and to Have Nice Things, up to a certain point. (I make about half a decent middle-class living from writing stories – and that’s pretty darn good in terms of the general run of Australian writers. I can’t legitimately complain, or not very loudly. I know I’m lucky.)
But that’s more avoidance of the depths than scaling of the heights. In terms of what I’d like to achieve, well, Cat Sparks once told me that she thought I’d peaked with Tender Morsels (she didn’t put it so bluntly; I think she said more that TM was my Big Significant Novel, and she couldn’t imagine my hitting such highs again). But the idea that everything else might be a trailing-off after that filled me with horror. [I think the success of Sea Hearts has proven Cat Sparks well and truly wrong! – Alan] I guess I hope that I’ll just get better and better until death stops me. And by better I don’t necessarily mean wealthier or more heavily loaded with prizes. That would be nice, but it’s not the main thing. I just want my stories’ explorations to be deeper and truer and more intelligent, and to hear, occasionally, that they do useful work inside their readers.
3. Whose career do you envy? Why?
Oh, look, anyone who’s had (and earned out) a seven-figure-or-more advance, or freakishly big sales, gives me a bit of a pang, simply because they can buy the slabs of time that make the efficient production of regular novels possible. They can focus, you know? They don’t have to always be fighting their way towards the writing; they can just pay the world to go away.
There’s a part of me that knows that it’s all good – any money flowing towards any writer is good for us all. There’s a part of me that’s happy enough knowing that my chances of getting an unexpected payment (sometimes a sizable one) in the mail/Paypal account are vastly greater than most wage-earners’. There’s a part of me that knows my own worth as a writer and can see how it sometimes meshes and sometimes doesn’t with public taste, and is quite philosophical about that. But sometimes I just get a bit tired of all the juggling, and I want life to be simpler.
Find Margo online at http://amongamidwhile.blogspot.com.au/ and on Twitter @margolanagan
.